The law of contract Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The law of contract - Essay ExampleAns. According to fairness of Contract exclusion clause in the body of the contract between two parties will be a term incorporated in the contractual schoolbook to lessen and restrict the liability of one or the other party to the contract.Whereas, the Limitation Clause instead of excluding liability of a party to a contract tends to limit the liability as the name suggests. An Exclusion clause will only be enforceable if it is validly incorporated in the text of the contract and it is clear and not ambiguous in its meaning, there should not be any statutory hindrance over it.(a) It should be a contained in the contract in a clear and unambiguous style and there should be no confusion regarding the meaning of the clause, in addition to that both the parties essential be aware about the inclusion of the clause in the text of the contract.Ans. ... In comparison to an Exclusion clause, a Limitation Clause is much in all probability to be enforce d.4. What are the different ways in which terms (exclusion clauses) may be incorporated into a contractAns. The different ways in which terms(exclusion clauses) may be incorporated into a contract are the following (a) It should be a contained in the contract in a clear and unambiguous manner and there should be no confusion regarding the meaning of the clause, in addition to that both the parties must be aware about the inclusion of the clause in the text of the contract.(b) If the language or meaning of the Exclusion clause is not clear then in that case the party that is going to affected more by it should be forewarned before making of the agreement.(c) Standard Terms and Conditions according to Trade practice should be incorporated in to the contract.(d) An Exclusion clause erect be incorporated in the contract by showing similar regular and consistent dealings between the parties in the past.5. What is meant by the contra proferentum ruleAns. By Contra proferentem rule it me ans that if there is a clause in the contract that carries more than one meaning and is unambiguous and not easy to interpret than in that case that unambiguous and confusing term will be taken against the party that forced its inclusion or the party who drafted the contract and incorporated the verbalise term. In other words the term will be read in favour of the second party that didnt insist on its inclusion in the body of the contract.6. What are the main differences between the sustenance of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) and Unfair Terms Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999Ans. The main difference between the provisions of the